Pornography Case: Raj Kundra seeks bail claiming no proof, says he’s being made a ‘scapegoat’

porn film circumstances (Pornography Caseaccused businessman in Raj Kundra (Raj Kundra) filed a bail utility within the court docket on Saturday, claiming that he was being made a ‘scapegoat’. It additionally stated that there isn’t a proof within the supplementary cost sheet filed within the case to show his direct involvement in making the alleged objectionable movie.

The Crime Branch, which is probing the case, has just lately filed a supplementary cost sheet in opposition to Raj Kundra and three others for allegedly making porn movies and broadcasting them with the assistance of sure apps. Thereafter the accused moved the Metropolitan Court and argued that the matter has been virtually investigated.

Raj Kundra Porn Case: Shilpa Shetty’s assertion – neither requested her husband nor did he ever inform something
Raj Kundra, husband of Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty, was arrested on July 19. A case has been registered in opposition to them below varied sections of the Indian Penal Code and Information Technology Act. Presently Raj Kundra is in judicial custody. Raj Kundra, within the bail utility filed by way of advocate Prashant Patil, claimed that until date the prosecution doesn’t have a single proof to hyperlink the ‘Hotshots’ app with the offense on the premise of regulation.

According to the prosecution, the accused used to add and stream pornographic materials by way of the Hotshots app. The bail utility additionally acknowledged that in all the supplementary cost sheet there’s not a single allegation in opposition to the current applicant (Raj Kundra) to point that he was actively concerned within the capturing of any video. Rather it’s on the discretion of the artist whether or not to add the content material to the App or not.

1467-page chargesheet in opposition to Raj Kundra, businessman in jail for 58 days for making porn movie
The utility stated that the contents of the grievance prima facie don’t disclose any offense in opposition to Kundra. The utility claimed that Raj Kundra was wrongly implicated within the case. His identify was not there within the FIR however the respondent (police) forcibly dragged his identify within the case.

The petition stated that the explanation for this will solely be given by the company however they’re being made a ‘scapegoat’. It stated that the investigation clearly exhibits that Raj Kundra isn’t remotely concerned in any offense of constructing “objectionable material”. court docket Raj Kundra bail The utility shall be heard on Monday.