Kundra, whereas submitting the bail plea earlier than the courtroom, had claimed that there was no proof towards him within the supplementary cost sheet filed by the Crime Branch of Mumbai Police within the case. Raj Kundra had filed a bail software within the courtroom on 18 September. He had filed a bail software by his lawyer Prashant Patil, which was heard on Monday and his bail was granted.
In this petition, he had mentioned that he was being made a scapegoat. In the petition filed, Raj had mentioned that there was no proof within the supplementary cost sheet filed within the case to immediately set up his involvement within the making of the alleged objectionable movie.
In reality, on this case, the Crime Branch group had just lately filed a supplementary cost sheet towards Raj Kundra and three others for making obscene (porn) movies and making them on air with the assistance of some apps. It was solely after this that Raj Kundra moved the Metropolitan Court and argued that the matter has been virtually investigated.
In the petition filed on behalf of Raj, it was mentioned that within the first place, no content material proves any offense towards him. It was additionally talked about on this software that Raj Kundra was wrongly implicated within the case although his identify was not talked about within the FIR and the police has forcibly dragged his identify within the case.
Raj Kundra launched from jail